The same crowdsourced sticky-note exercise, run independently at two venues — AIGA's Design Educators Community and a Design Research Society conference — merged into one reference document, with a unified field atlas, a full index of every named source across both, and a clearly-marked added layer that fills gaps the two rooms left open.
Both uploaded PDFs are the source — DEC‑Mapping of Design Research and Scholarship (AIGA DEC edition) and DRS_FoE_Mapping_of_Research_and_Scholarship.pdf. Each is a photographed corkboard of anonymous sticky notes from a live workshop; neither is a set of researched claims, so most individual entries have no citation beyond "an anonymous participant wrote this." I've kept every specific named person, institution, publication, and URL that participants themselves wrote, exactly as written, and compiled all of them into one index — jump to Sources & References Index ↓ — so anything "sourced" in the ordinary sense is easy to find in one place rather than buried in sticky notes.
Where a document quoted someone else's published work (an essay by Audrey Bennett, a diagram from Chris Jones's Design Methods redrawn in Meredith Davis's Graphic Design Theory, a line from designer Cheryl D. Miller, and verbatim institutional policy language from MICA and a "College of Arts, Media and Design"), I paraphrased rather than reproduced the wording — flagged in amber wherever it appears below.
As with the individual atlases, the underlying text extraction doesn't preserve exact spatial position on either corkboard, so notes are regrouped under each page's own stated question, with a handful of ambiguous items placed by best judgment rather than false precision.
This expanded edition adds a fourth and fifth provenance tier to the Field Atlas only. Purple items are inferred from the responses — relocating things the participants themselves said elsewhere in the documents into clusters where they logically belong (e.g., filling the DRS room's empty "Movements" circle with that room's own scattered language). Gold items come from general domain knowledge of the field — Claude's additions, not the participants' — used to fill categories neither room mapped. Gold items carry no evidentiary weight from the workshops; where they reference real works, journals, or organizations, those are listed in the appendix under "References supporting the added layer." Chapters I–III remain pure transcription, untouched.
How respondents describe their specialization, what counts as output, where it goes, and how their institutions recognize any of it as "research."
Personal philosophies, workload realities, competing models of what "research" should mean, and the gap between what people want to pursue and what their institutions support.
The same territory turned toward design practice itself: what inspires the work, how a real project unfolds, and when it's finished.
Specializations, what gets produced, where it's sent into the world, and how institutions recognize (or don't) any of it as "research."
Design theory, personal philosophy, real workload splits, the deeper (and more skeptical) purposes assigned to research, and the barriers in the way.
The same territory turned toward design practice: what starts the work, how a project actually unfolds, and how people talk about it.
Both workshops closed with almost the same diagram — independently, two rooms of design researchers converged on nearly identical clusters for mapping the field. Merged here into one atlas, with each item tagged by which workshop it came from.
A consolidated glossary of 596 terms, organized conceptually, merging the vocabulary mined from this atlas's two workshops with four external documents: two course vocabulary lists (Brodeur ADV 1160/1200; Trager ADV 1161), an uploaded reference glossary (Glossary for Designers), and a previously compiled Communication Design Glossary. Every entry carries source chips; atlas-derived terms keep the atlas's own three-tier provenance.
Every specific named person, institution, publication, or link that appears in either source document, in one place — plus a separate table of references supporting the added (purple/gold) layer. This is the complete sourcing picture: everything not listed here is either an anonymous participant's own statement (no further source exists) or explicitly-labeled general knowledge.
| Dr. Vincent Covello | Cited as admired, re: research clarity and public engagement | AIGA |
| Dr. Roger Schank | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Dr. Fernando Flores | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Mariana Amatullo | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Erik Stolterman | Admired for the clarity and usefulness of his research | AIGA |
| Liz Sanders | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Arturo Escobar | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Lauren McCarthy | UCLA — cited as admired | AIGA |
| Maria Rosario Jackson | Cited as admired | AIGA |
| Meredith Davis | Named directly under Theories & Philosophies; also credited (as "M. Davis") with tenure/promotion criteria used at NC State; author of Graphic Design Theory, referenced for a diagram on p. 218 | AIGA · DRS |
| Louise Sandhaus | Admired for surfacing under-seen designers' stories, e.g. Gere Kavanaugh | DRS |
| Gere Kavanaugh | Named as an example of an under-seen designer, via Sandhaus | DRS |
| Ahmed Ansari | Admired for writing, talks, and curriculum development | DRS |
| Jessica Wexler | Praised for unusually clear tenure documentation | DRS |
| Paul Soulellis | Admired for rethinking dissemination systems, via Urgency Publications | DRS |
| Gunter Wehmeyer | Met through a Design Inquiry workshop; runs unidentifiedfacility.org | DRS |
| Ellen Lupton | Credited by a respondent with the framing "design is storytelling" | DRS |
| Cheryl D. Miller | Quoted (paraphrased here) on authenticity as a measure of success | DRS |
| Audrey Bennett | Author of the referenced essay "The Rise of Research in Graphic Design" (paraphrased) | DRS |
| Chris Jones | Author of Design Methods, source of a referenced diagram (paraphrased) | DRS |
| AIGA / AIGA DEC | Host community for the first workshop; also named as a dissemination channel | AIGA |
| Design Incubation | Credit mark on both diagrams — apparent producer of the workshop materials | AIGA · DRS |
| San Francisco State University | Source of a publicly shared RTP criteria document | AIGA |
| NC State University | Referenced re: research/tenure criteria attributed to Meredith Davis | AIGA |
| Design Research Society (DRS) | Host of the second workshop; also listed as a named society and conference | DRS |
| Design History Society | Listed as a design/research society | DRS |
| IASDR | International Association of Societies of Design Research | DRS |
| The Design Society | Listed as a design/research society | DRS |
| Michigan State University, Dept. of Art, Art History & Design | Named as a source of shared research guidelines | DRS |
| MICA (Maryland Institute College of Art) | Institutional "Professional and Creative Activity" policy, paraphrased | DRS |
| CUNY — New York City College of Technology | Source of a publicly shared faculty personnel process guide | DRS |
| Superflux | Cited as an admired studio/practice | DRS |
| MIT Media Lab | Cited as an admired research community | DRS |
| Urgency Publications | Paul Soulellis's project, cited approvingly | DRS |
| Design and Culture | Journal, listed as a dissemination channel | AIGA |
| AIGA Eye on Design | Listed as a dissemination channel | AIGA |
| Communication Arts | Design awards / magazine, listed as a channel | AIGA · DRS |
| Dialectic | Design journal, listed as a channel | AIGA |
| Slanted Magazine | Listed as a channel/trade magazine | AIGA · DRS |
| Information Design Journal | Listed under design/research repositories | AIGA |
| Visible Language | Listed under design/research repositories | AIGA |
| are.na design-journals list | A respondent's curated link — see URLs below | AIGA |
| Just My Type | Cited as an example of mass-market design writing | DRS |
| Design Methods, Chris Jones | Source of a referenced diagram (paraphrased, not reproduced) | DRS |
| Graphic Design Theory, Meredith Davis | Diagram redrawn from p. 218 (paraphrased, not reproduced) | DRS |
| "The Rise of Research in Graphic Design," Audrey Bennett | Essay excerpted in the workshop materials (paraphrased, not reproduced) | DRS |
| Christopher Frayling, "Research in Art and Design" (1993) | Royal College of Art Research Papers — origin of the research into / through / for design triad that the AIGA board used; cited here as lineage for the added "practice-based research" item | added |
| Nigel Cross, "Designerly Ways of Knowing" (1982) | Design Studies — canonical argument that design has its own epistemology; basis for the added methodology item | added |
| Design Studies | Elsevier — long-running design research journal, added to Societies & Repositories | added |
| Design Issues | MIT Press — design history, theory and criticism journal, added | added |
| She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation | Tongji University / Elsevier, open access — added | added |
| International Journal of Design | Open-access design research journal — added | added |
| Journal of Design History | Oxford University Press / Design History Society — added | added |
| W3C Web Accessibility Initiative / WCAG | Standards body and guidelines underpinning the added Accessibility cluster | added |
These are offered as verifiable anchors for the gold domain-knowledge items only. Claude has not searched or verified current publication status; readers should confirm details before formal citation. Everything else in the added layer that lacks a row here is general field knowledge with no single citable source — and is labeled accordingly rather than given a manufactured citation.
| facaffairs.sfsu.edu — RTP Criteria for Design, 2019 | Shared as an example of public tenure/promotion criteria | AIGA |
| are.na/jason-alejandro/design-journals | A respondent's curated list of design journals | AIGA |
| citytech.cuny.edu — Guide to the Faculty Personnel Process | Shared as an example of public research/tenure guidelines | DRS |
| unidentifiedfacility.org | Gunter Wehmeyer's site, cited by a respondent | DRS |